
blue
additionally
i understand needing to step back to breathe and gather your thoughts. that’s normal.
but it’s evident now that when you are very clearly on the losing end of your own argument and you have no way to turn it around, you run away from it and never touch it again but tack on the false promise of getting back to it when you are in a better mind.
there were things you guys kept claiming you needed to talk about since OCTOBER OF LAST YEAR that i still have no idea about. you can’t expect me to open that conversation up when it’s something you guys wanted to talk about without telling me things further.
because stepping back under the guise that i was unwell isn’t right. yes, you mentioned other very nonspecific reasons, yet somehow this one was a very clear call to something you wanted to pick out. it could have been left completely nondescript, yet by stating very specifically me being calm and rational and leaving everything else nondescript (though i am not asking you to specify because those can be private) you end up turning me into the reason that you have to step away, which reads as running away by, once again, using a line that you have used on me multiple times.
you are not acknowledging that part for what it is. it is an appeal to emotion. that is a fallacy at best.
also, might i mention, you were the one who blocked me? and you both were the ones who said you were closing my vent chat indefinitely? i made it a point not to toggle the @ when replying so you did not have to deal with the notification of a direct reply. you put words into my mouth by saying i am belittling you for taking a step back and for scolding you. what i said in my additional message talks about something i have noticed, backed up by the fact that it has been mentioned by you that your brain takes one side having all the blame as closure, and it can be inferred here in that message that that side cannot be you.
in saying that i am scolding and belittling you, you are pinning the blame onto me and again, proving my point. asking me to reword what i said told me it wasn’t fully read because of how much context followed afterwards. assuming so was a fault in my part, i will acknowledge that, though i made a statement to point out that it was all in there. the statement i am replying to now is me telling you that this has, in fact, happened before, and many times. that on its own needs its own acknowledgment.
if you want to take a step back, then do so. i’m not keeping you here, i’m not telling you to continue this conversation. if you want the conversation to stop, then stop responding. i am not trying to win an argument, i am not trying to make you lose face, i am only stating what i have been given and what i know to be a commonality, hence why it was addressed.